[mad-user] Comparing with old decoders

Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:04:02 +0700

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C08B08.8E9E1D60
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Does anyone compare MAD quality with NAD and Appolo decoders? I mean =
objective comparing with frequency analysis etc, not sayings like =
"smooth and deep sound of decoder"

------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C08B08.8E9E1D60
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dkoi8-r" http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2014.210" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Does anyone compare MAD quality with =
NAD and Appolo=20
decoders? I mean objective comparing with frequency analysis etc, not =
sayings=20
like "smooth and deep sound of decoder"</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C08B08.8E9E1D60--