[mad-user] winamp plugin speed
Mon, 20 Nov 2000 13:28:32 -0500
Gabriel Bouvigne <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Isn't mad supposed to be faster than mpg123? In this case, why is in_mad
> much slower than in_mpg123?
MAD is only faster than mpg123 on hardware without native floating-point
It's not clear whether MAD can be made faster than mpg123 on x86 hardware
given its fixed-point implementation, but the performance issue is still being
worked on. It can certainly be improved.